Who We Built This For
Who is Kindred rOS built for?
The loneliest fundraisers I meet are not always the ones working alone.
Some of them sit on teams of thirty. They have colleagues in the next room, a communications department, an events person, and a database administrator who is genuinely good. And they still hold two hundred relationships in their own head, because nobody has ever built a way to hand one over.
Loneliness in this work has less to do with headcount than we assume. It has to do with whether what you know can be seen by anyone else.
None of that was anybody's doing. It is simply what happens when what a person knows outgrows anywhere it could be written.
I meet these people constantly. The one-person shop who writes the appeal, stuffs the envelopes, and still remembers that a supporter's daughter starts university this month. The associate on a team of thirty who covers for everybody and has never once been covered for. The volunteer who has kept the giving records straight for eleven years, has never asked anyone to notice, and deserves noticing anyway.
The shop of one or two
You are the strategy, the writing, the events, the thank-you notes, and the person who notices when a family goes quiet. There is no version of your week where you are not choosing what to drop.
What you need is not more effort. It is a shorter list of better-chosen names, and permission to let the rest wait without guilt.
The fundraiser inside a large organization
You are not short of colleagues. You are short of shared memory. When you take a holiday, the relationships take one too. When somebody offers to help, you have nothing to hand them, because the plan is a set of instincts rather than a page.
This one surprises people, so I will say it plainly. Being on a big team does not mean anybody shares the carrying.
The support raiser
Your list is names and hope, and it is personal in a way institutional fundraising is not. Every conversation is partly about your own work and your own household. The stakes are close.
You need a way to be systematic that does not make you feel like a salesperson, because you are not one.
The consultant
You hold several of these at once, each with a different list, a different history, and a different level of chaos. You need the same discipline to travel across all of them without carrying four organizations in your memory.
A team of thirty can still leave one person holding every relationship.
Who it is not for
If you have fewer than about forty relationships, you do not need this. You need a notebook and a Friday afternoon.
And if you want software that will decide who deserves your attention, this will disappoint you. It will not do that, on purpose.
Being outnumbered by your own list is arithmetic, not a character flaw.
The C.A.R.E.™ lens
Relationship and Engagement carry most of this. Relationship asks what has actually happened between you and a person, which is the knowledge that leaves when you leave. Engagement asks where they currently stand with the work, from unaware through to advocate. Written down, both become things a colleague can act on. Held privately, they are only ever yours.
Try this Tuesday
Pick the five relationships you would least want to lose. For each one, write what somebody would need to know to take a meeting in your place tomorrow. Not the giving history. The context: what they care about, what has been promised, what to avoid.
If that takes real effort to produce, it is not a memory failure. It is the shape of the problem.
If you recognized yourself in one of those four, why Kindred says the rest of it. Not because you need a bigger operation, but because the people you already know should not have to live inside one head.
Keep up the good work of caring for people. It really does matter!
Kevin Eastway Founder and Principal, Kindred rOS
Three ways to stay connected:
- Subscribe to Fundraising from the Heart
- Follow Kindred rOS on LinkedIn
- Share this edition with a fundraiser who may need it