What $75 Million Taught Us About Better Invitations
What have fundraisers learned about prioritizing donors?
Almost every experienced fundraiser has a version of the same story. Somebody gave far more than anyone expected, and nobody expected it because nobody had ever really sat down with them.
Nobody overlooked that person on purpose. There were more relationships in the file than one week could hold.
More than $75 million has been raised using C.A.R.E.™ I am going to spend this edition on what that taught rather than on the number, because the number is only interesting if the lessons transfer.
Prioritizing can be visible, and that is the good news
The first thing it taught is that prioritizing is not a gift. It is a procedure.
Fundraisers are often told to trust their instincts, and instincts are genuinely good. But instinct is a memory system, and memory was never built to hold four hundred people fairly. It holds the pleasant ones, the recent ones, and the ones who reply quickly.
So the question is not whether you have judgment. It is whether your judgment gets applied to everybody or only to the thirty who came to mind.
You are not choosing badly. You are choosing from a smaller list than you think.
Think about who does not come to mind. The supporter who has given quietly for six years and never once replied to an email. The board member who keeps meaning to make an introduction and feels bad every time she remembers. The person who has asked for nothing in a decade and would say yes to a coffee, if anybody thought to offer one.
Absolute thresholds do not survive a real list
The second lesson is about numbers that sound rigorous and are not.
Any fixed line, everyone above a certain score gets a visit, breaks the moment it meets an actual list. One organization's whole list sits under the line. Another's whole list sits over it. The line was never about the people; it was about the organization's size.
So the answer cannot be a universal cutoff pretending every organization has the same relationships, hopes, or history. A small shop and a large shop both need an honest answer rooted in what they actually know.
The overlooked relationship is where possibility is hiding
The third lesson is the one I would most want to hand somebody starting out.
Almost everybody over-attends the obvious names and under-attends the relationships that have been quietly growing. Those supporters receive nothing because they are neither urgent nor loud, and they are exactly the people for whom a thoughtful invitation and real follow-through can change the conversation.
There is a fourth lesson underneath those three, and it is less about method. The quiet, loyal supporter almost never surfaces on instinct alone. She does not complain, she does not ask for meetings, and she may keep giving steadily for years while slowly feeling less connected. A sorted list finds her. A memory does not.
Under-inviting is quieter than over-asking, and it costs more.
The C.A.R.E.™ lens
The five inputs do different work together. Monthly High Hope and Annual High Hope name what you honestly believe may be possible. Attributes hold what you know about fit and story. Relationship and Engagement bring the lived connection forward. None is a verdict on a person. Together, they make your reasoning visible so the invitation can become wiser.
Try this Tuesday
Find five supporters who rarely come to mind first. Count how many received a personal invitation, a thoughtful follow-through, or a meaningful shared experience in the last twelve months.
If the answer is close to none, you have found the most valuable unattended group on your list, and it has been there the whole time.
More on where this came from: why Kindred. Not because your judgment needs correcting, but because the instinct you already have deserves the whole list.
Keep up the good work of caring for people. It really does matter!
Kevin Eastway Founder and Principal, Kindred rOS
Three ways to stay connected:
- Subscribe to Fundraising from the Heart
- Follow Kindred rOS on LinkedIn
- Share this edition with a fundraiser who may need it